Why I Don’t Care About Getting Digg Traffic

Date November 23, 2007

Welcome to BloggingNotes. You may want to subscribe to my full text RSS feed. This message will only appear once. Thanks for visiting!

I have to admit to being hesitant about whether or not I should even
post this because there are probably going to be people who claim that
it’s a ‘linkbait’ post. But that’s not my intention - this is just
something that I feel I need to get out.

So if it draws comments, positive or negative, I can live with that.

If you think I’m full of it, that’s fine too. Don’t zoom it on BloggingZoom. Bury it if you want.
Whatever.

I know that a lot of bloggers want to have a story get popular enough to
wind up on the front page of digg, and for the life of me, I cannot
figure out why. The digg nation is extremely fickle, and to think that
if one of your posts gets dugg and a flood of traffic comes in that that
traffic is going to return is just naive. And the chances that a blog
post will wind up on the front page aren’t very high. Unless you have a
large network of friends that you can get to digg your post, it’s
probably not going to happen.

And if the post gets buried a couple of times, it doesn’t matter what
your friends do. It’ll go nowhere.

That’s why I think that something like BZ is a much more powerful tool
for bloggers. Submitting your own stuff is fine. In fact, it’s
encouraged. Sure, stuff could get buried, but if it does, there’s a
better chance that it was for a legitimate reason, rather than you just
rubbed someone the wrong way. Or you didn’t have the right number of
friends. Obviously this isn’t always the way that it is on digg, but
there’s never been a shortage of stories about how some members of the
digg nation abuse the ‘power’ that they seem to have.

Don’t get me wrong, I am NOT against the idea of what digg does - it’s
what BZ is based on as well, after all. It’s just that the current incarnation of digg is not something that I really care if I ever attract.

Write your posts for your readers, not for digg or Google. Your
*readers* are the ones that will come back.

You’ve just got to give them a reason to.

(I may or may not get a chance to check in and follow up on this post as I just found out that I’m moving to a new position at work. But I will be approving comments whenever I get a chance. I just might not be able to respond to them right away.)

Send the word: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • bloggingzoom

Related Posts

10 Responses to “Why I Don’t Care About Getting Digg Traffic”

  1. Alex @ Web 2.0 WordPress Guide said:

    Great points. I agree the BZ delivers a lot more to a blogger and actually get people interested in your content and willing to participate and comment on your blog, as opposed to Digg …

    I guess its a matter of a difference between one hit wonder and a consistent quality traffic :) we all shoot to what we are trying to accomplish …

  2. Tim said:

    I agree. I never could seem to get into Digg. I feel that BZ is much more able to meet the needs of bloggers.

  3. RT Cunningham said:

    I agree that Digg isn’t the traffic-generator we want. The only thing I find good about Digg is the backlinks that Google seems to love. Besides, what do you expect from a social site that’s dominated mainly by 12-year olds?

  4. Jason A Clark said:

    I’ve never quite understood the obsession with Digg that some bloggers have either. It’s not quality traffic for the most part (if you can even get it) and there’s a good chance it would crash your site if you did actually get the front page. Building a community of readers will serve you much better in the long run than building a hit or miss series of articles to try to lure in some visitors from Digg

  5. Rod said:

    @Alex: That’s a great comparison. Why be a one hit wonder when you can hang around a lot longer and get a much higher and valuable quality of traffic.

    Thanks very much for the contribution.

  6. Rod said:

    @RT: Heh. It was actually the backlash from the 12 year olds that I didn’t want to attract with this post. I’m glad to see that it didn’t have the negative impact that I was a little worried about.

    And yeah, I’ve found BZ traffic to be of a higher standard than what you’d get from Digg.

  7. Rod said:

    @Jason: I’ve said for a long time that the only good thing that comes from your site being Dugg is that you get to test your server against an onslaught of traffic.

  8. Free Blog Reviews said:

    Digg is a joke anymore and you are correct, front page means nothing if the traffic isn’t going to return later.

  9. Rod said:

    True enough. In fact it doesn’t matter *where* it comes from if it doesn’t come back. It’s kind of the equivalent of your 15 minutes of fame.

  10. Louie said:

    Thanks for a great insight.I will be looking forward to your posts. :) Peace!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments for this post will be closed on 6 December 2008.


This blog uses the CommentLuv plugin which will try and parse your sites feed and display a link to your last post, please be patient while it tries to find it for you.